Log In Register

Source & Citation Info

title:“Hugh Williamson to James Madison”
authors:Hugh Williamson
date written:1788-6-2

permanent link
to this version:
https://consource.org/document/hugh-williamson-to-james-madison-1788-6-2/20130122084257/
last updated:Jan. 22, 2013, 8:42 a.m. UTC
retrieved:July 17, 2019, 6:31 p.m. UTC

transcription
citation:
Williamson, Hugh. "Letter to James Madison." The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. Vol. 3. Ed. Max Farrand. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1911. Print.

Hugh Williamson to James Madison (June 2, 1788)

New York June 2nd 1788
By the Time this comes to Hand you will be pretty well engaged in discussing the new Constitution & attempting to convince men who came forward with the Resolution not to be convinced. Of all the wrong heads who have started in opposition none have been mentioned who appear to be so palpably wrong as the People of Kentucke. It is said that some antifed in Maryland on the last Winter fastened on the Ear of Genl Wilkinson who was accidentally there and persuaded him that in case of a new Govt. the Navigation of the Mississippi would infallibly be given up. Your Recollection must certainly enable you to say that there is a Proviso in the new Sistem which was inserted for the express purpose of preventing a majority of the Senate or of the States which is considered as the same thing from giving up the Mississippi It is provided that two thirds of the Members present in the senate shall be required to concur in making Treaties and if the southern states attend to their Duty, this will imply ⅔. of the States in the Union together with the President, a security rather better than the present 9 States especially as Vermont & the Province of Main may be added to the Eastern Interest and you may recollect that when a Member, Mr Willson objected to this Proviso, saying that in all Govts. the Majority should govern it was replyed that the Navigation of the Mississippi after what had already happened in Congress was not to be risqued in the Hands of a meer Majority and the Objection was withdrawn.

Resource Metadata

Type

Date

1788-6-2

Authors

Recipients

Collections

Annotations (0)